Discrepancy between radiological and pathological size of renal masses

نویسندگان

  • Nicola N Jeffery
  • Norbert Douek
  • Ding Y Guo
  • Manish I Patel
چکیده

OBJECTIVE To investigate the differences between tumor sizes measured by preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging and pathologic examination of surgical specimens in Chinese patients who received extirpative surgery for renal tumors. METHODS From September 2008 to September 2010, 204 patients with renal tumors treated in the Renji Hospital were enrolled in this study, and their clinicopathological data were collected and analyzed. The paired Student's t-test was used to compare the mean radiological tumor maximum diameter and the mean pathological tumor maximum diameter. All cases in which post-operative down-staging or up-staging occurred due to the discrepancy between radiological and pathological tumor maximum diameters were identified. In addition, the relationship between radiological and pathological tumor maximum diameters and histological subtypes was analyzed. RESULTS Overall, the radiological mean maximum diameter of tumors on CT was 48.3 mm and the pathological mean maximum diameter was 47.0 mm. On average, CT overestimated pathological size by 1.3 mm (P = 0.018). CT overestimated pathological tumor size in 111 (54.4%) patients, underestimated in 71 (34.8%) patients and equal pathological size in 22 (10.8%) patients. Among the 190 patients with pT1 or pT2 tumors, there was a discrepancy between clinical and pathological staging in 35 (18.4%) patients. Of these, 29 (15.3%) patients were down-staged post-operatively and 6 (3.2%) were up-staged. When subjects were categorized according to radiographic tumor size associated with clinical stage, statistically significant difference (average of 1.76 mm) was observed between radiographic and pathologic maximum diameters ranging 41-70 mm (P = 0.035). For clear cell carcinoma, mean radiographic tumor maximum diameter was significantly larger than the pathologic maximum diameter by 1.69 mm (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS There is a statistically significant but small difference (1.3 mm) between mean radiological and mean pathological tumor maximum diameters. For some patients, this difference leads to a discrepancy between clinical and pathological staging, which may have implications on pre-operative clinical decision and prognosis prediction.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Evaluation of Clinico Ultra-Sonography and Pathological Findings of Ovarian Masses in Patients referred to Kosar Hospital, Qazvin

Introduction: Today, despite many optimal imaging methods for evaluation of ovarian mass, the survival rate of patient was not significantly changed. Object of present study was evaluation of Clinico Ultra- Sonography and pathological findings of ovarian masses in patients referred to Kosar Hospital. Methods: In this analytic study, information of clinico Ultra-Sonography and pathological findi...

متن کامل

ارتباط سایز پاتولوژیک تومور رنال سل کارسینوما با پارامترهای پاتولوژیک نمونه‌های رادیکال نفرکتومی انجام شده در بیمارستان امام خمینی تهران بین سال‌های 1385 تا 1390

   Background & Aims: It was aimed to determine the relation between pathological size of renal cell carcinoma on microscopic pathological parameters of radical nephrectomy specimen. Material & Methods: In a retrospective study, we reviewed pathological finding of 76 patients that underwent radical nephrectomy during 2006-2011. We studied the relations between pathological size of tumor with nu...

متن کامل

Retrospective evaluation of discrepancies between radiological and pathological size of hepatocellular carcinoma masses.

BACKGROUND The size of a hepatic neoplasm is critical for staging, prognosis and selection of appropriate treatment. Our study aimed to compare the radiological size of solid hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) masses on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the pathological size in a Chinese population, and to elucidate discrepancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 178 consecutive patients diag...

متن کامل

Differential Diagnosis of Complex Renal Cysts Based on Lesion Size along with the Bosniak Renal Cyst Classification

PURPOSE To identify size criteria for complex cystic renal masses that can distinguish renal cell carcinoma from benign cysts supplementing the Bosniak classification. MATERIALS AND METHODS We reviewed the records of 97 patients who underwent surgery for complex cystic renal masses from January 2001 to April 2010. The pathological results were compared with the lesion sizes measured by preope...

متن کامل

Impact of preoperative radiological and postoperative pathological findings on survival of patients after radical nephrectomy performed with the indication of renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of preoperative radiological and postoperative pathological findings on survival of patients after radical nephrectomy because of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed 159 consecutive radical nephrectomy between December 2007 and January 2014. We evaluated age, gender, complaints, operation time, comorbidity, computed tomography (CT) an...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 11  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011